翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ The Art of Storytelling (Dirty album)
・ The Art of Tea
・ The Art of the Engine Driver
・ The Art of the Faker
・ The Art of the Game
・ The Art of the Heist
・ The Art of the Improvisers
・ The Art of the Metaobject Protocol
・ The Art of the Motorcycle
・ The Art of The Netherlands (recording)
・ The Art of the Rifle
・ The Art of the Sale
・ The Art of the Song
・ The Art of the Start
・ The Art of the Steal
The Art of the Steal (2009 film)
・ The Art of the Steal (2013 film)
・ The Art of the Sucker Punch
・ The Art of the Theremin
・ The Art of The Trio
・ The Art of the Trio Volume One
・ The Art of Thinking Clearly
・ The Art of This Century gallery
・ The Art of Three
・ The Art of Touring
・ The Art of Transformation
・ The Art of Transformation (album)
・ The Art of Translation
・ The Art of Unix Programming
・ The Art of Video Games


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

The Art of the Steal (2009 film) : ウィキペディア英語版
The Art of the Steal (2009 film)

''The Art of the Steal'' is a 2009 documentary film about the controversial move of the Barnes Foundation, generally considered to be the world's best collection of post-Impressionist art and valued in 2009 to be worth at least $25-billion, from Merion, Pennsylvania to Philadelphia. The move was disputed because Doctor Albert C. Barnes, who died in 1951, had specifically selected Lower Merion Township for its location. The collection was moved in 2012 to downtown Philadelphia. The film presents an account of the claimed breaking of Barnes' will, which it presents as a decades-long process that was initiated by Philadelphians who were enemies of Barnes while he was alive, and that was continued by their heirs.
==Subject and making of the film==
The will of Dr. Barnes established the Foundation with strict rules against ever moving the collection or any of its paintings away from its location, and to serve primarily as a school for the teaching of art, art criticism, and art appreciation, and not primarily as a museum for the general public. The people who supported the move argued that the collection should instead become a major tourist-attraction for Philadelphia. The supporters of Merion claimed that the Philadelphians were less interested in Dr. Barnes's will than in enhancing their power by taking over the control of a $25+ billion asset.
The collection was located in a residential neighborhood about five miles from Philadelphia. Because of the constant efforts by the Philadelphia aristocracy to seize the collection, the State of Pennsylvania refrained from contributing funds to make its endowment sufficient, but secretly arranged to provide $100 million of taxpayer funds only once the control of the Foundation was taken over by the new board. The new president and officers of the board succeeded in challenging the will to enable it to send some pieces on tour to earn enough money for needed renovations to the facility to preserve the artwork and provide security. But little went to the upkeep of the facility, because the funds were drained away by the legal contest of the will.
The 9,000-piece collection of mostly late-19th- and early-20th-century art includes 181 Renoirs, 69 Cézannes, 60 Matisses, 44 Picassos, and 14 Modiglianis. What makes the collection extraordinary is not just the artists, but that Dr. Barnes acquired so many of the very best works of each of those masters. The extraordinarily high overall quality of the works is the chief special attribute of the collection.
While the film includes journalists, art historians and public figures on both sides of the long debate, many of the figures discussed in it, such as Rebecca Rimel (CEO of the Pew Charitable Trusts, the group which purportedly benefited financially from the Barnes's move), Raymond G. Perelman (a powerful local billionaire alleged to have orchestrated the move); and Bernard C. Watson (the president of the Barnes Foundation, who was accused of giving over its control to the Philadelphia authorities), declined to be interviewed for the documentary.
Director Don Argott placed an emphasis on the breaking of Barnes' will, and used graphics to illustrate how its clauses were challenged and overcome, one by one, a style that Constance Rosenblum of ''The New York Times'' saw as "heavy-handed". Argott defends the style, saying, "We were trying to tell a compelling story, using all the tools at our disposal. We didn’t want to make a boring talking-heads documentary. We wanted to make a work that would resonate with audiences, and these are the kinds of works that do." He added, "Whether or not you agree with the will, it represents Barnes’s point of view, and it’s our script for how he thought.”〔(【引用サイトリンク】url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/21/movies/21barnes.html?pagewanted=2 )

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「The Art of the Steal (2009 film)」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.